AMD Opteron 6308 vs Intel Xeon E5-2609
Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron 6308 and Intel Xeon E5-2609 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 6308
- Around 6% higher maximum core temperature: 74.40°C vs 70.0°C
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 60% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.902 vs 6.741
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 20.184 vs 5.911
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.41 vs 0.303
- Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.802 vs 2.75
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum core temperature | 74.40°C vs 70.0°C |
| L2 cache | 4 MB vs 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB vs 10240 KB (shared) |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.902 vs 6.741 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 20.184 vs 5.911 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.41 vs 0.303 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.802 vs 2.75 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon E5-2609
- Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 115 Watt
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.586 vs 1.163
| Specifications (specs) | |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 192 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 115 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.586 vs 1.163 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Opteron 6308
CPU 2: Intel Xeon E5-2609
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Opteron 6308 | Intel Xeon E5-2609 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.902 | 6.741 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 20.184 | 5.911 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.41 | 0.303 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.163 | 1.586 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.802 | 2.75 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1152 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5901 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 484 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1634 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Opteron 6308 | Intel Xeon E5-2609 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Family | AMD Opteron | |
| OPN Tray | OS6308WKT4GHK | |
| Place in performance rating | 3029 | 2812 |
| Series | AMD Opteron 6300 Series Processor | Intel® Xeon® Processor E5 Family |
| Vertical segment | Server | Server |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge EP | |
| Launch date | March 2012 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $143 | |
| Price now | $78 | |
| Processor Number | E5-2609 | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.40 | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 3.5 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 10240 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 74.40°C | 70.0°C |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
| Unlocked | ||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Bus Speed | 6.4 GT/s QPI | |
| Die size | 294 mm | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | |
| Number of QPI Links | 2 | |
| Transistor count | 1270 million | |
| VID voltage range | 0.60V-1.35V | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory frequency | 2000 MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 800/1066 |
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 4 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 384 GB | |
Compatibility |
||
| Sockets supported | G34 | FCLGA2011 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | |
| Package Size | 52.5mm x 45.0mm | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 40 | |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
| Scalability | 2S Only | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||