Intel Xeon E5-2689 vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon E5-2689 and AMD Ryzen 3 2200G processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon E5-2689

  • 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
  • 12 more threads: 16 vs 4
Number of cores 8 vs 4
Number of threads 16 vs 4
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 2 vs 1

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

  • CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
  • Around 3% higher clock speed: 3.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz
  • Around 83% higher maximum core temperature: 95°C vs 52°C
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm FinFET vs 32 nm
  • Around 77% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 115 Watt
  • 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.581 vs 9.219
  • 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 356.091 vs 123.121
  • 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.276 vs 0.974
  • 10x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.679 vs 3.868
  • 14.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 136.274 vs 9.539
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 12 February 2018 vs 6 Mar 2012
Unlocked Unlocked vs Locked
Maximum frequency 3.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz
Maximum core temperature 95°C vs 52°C
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm FinFET vs 32 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 115 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 28.581 vs 9.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 356.091 vs 123.121
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.276 vs 0.974
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 38.679 vs 3.868
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 136.274 vs 9.539

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Xeon E5-2689
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
9.219
28.581
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
123.121
356.091
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.974
2.276
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
3.868
38.679
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
9.539
136.274
Name Intel Xeon E5-2689 AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 9.219 28.581
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 123.121 356.091
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.974 2.276
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 3.868 38.679
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 9.539 136.274
PassMark - Single thread mark 2047
PassMark - CPU mark 6746
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 852
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 2736
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score 1678
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2802
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3768
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 10990
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2802
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3768
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 10990

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Xeon E5-2689 AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

Essentials

Architecture codename Sandy Bridge Zen
Launch date 6 Mar 2012 12 February 2018
Place in performance rating 2155 330
Processor Number E5-2689
Vertical segment Server Desktop
Family AMD Ryzen Processors
OPN PIB YD2200C5FBBOX
OPN Tray YD2200C5M4MFB
OS Support Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit
Price now $97.99
Series AMD Ryzen 3 Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics
Value for money (0-100) 22.31

Performance

64 bit support
Base frequency 2.6 GHz 3.5 GHz
Bus Speed 8 GT/s QPI
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 14 nm FinFET
Maximum core temperature 52°C 95°C
Maximum frequency 3.6 GHz 3.7 GHz
Number of cores 8 4
Number of QPI Links 2
Number of threads 16 4
VID voltage range 0.6V - 1.35V
Die size 246 mm
L1 cache 384 KB
L2 cache 2 MB
L3 cache 4 MB
Number of GPU cores 8
Transistor count 4500 Million
Unlocked

Memory

ECC memory support
Max memory channels 4 2
Maximum memory bandwidth 51.2 GB/s
Maximum memory size 384 GB
Supported memory types DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600 DDR4
Supported memory frequency 2993 MHz

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 2 1
Sockets supported LGA2011 AM4
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt 65 Watt
Configurable TDP 46-65 Watt
Thermal Solution Wraith Stealth

Peripherals

Max number of PCIe lanes 40
PCI Express revision 3.0 3.0 x8
PCIe configurations x4, x8, x16
Scalability 2S

Security & Reliability

Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

Advanced Technologies

Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Intel 64
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
AMD SenseMI
AMD VR Ready Processors
Enmotus FuzeDrive
FreeSync

Virtualization

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)

Graphics

Graphics max frequency 1100 MHz
iGPU core count 8
Processor graphics Radeon Vega 8 Graphics

Graphics interfaces

DisplayPort
HDMI