AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6400 and NVIDIA Quadro P4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1923 MHz vs 1202 MHz
- Around 57% higher boost clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1480 MHz
- 671.9x more texture fill rate: 111.4 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 89% lower typical power consumption: 53 Watt vs 100 Watt
| Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 vs 6 February 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1923 MHz vs 1202 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1480 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 111.4 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- 2.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 768
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 3.8x more memory clock speed: 7604 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 795 vs 717
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11545 vs 7651
- 6.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1115 vs 176
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42289 vs 33004
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1792 vs 768 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 vs 717 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11545 vs 7651 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1115 vs 176 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 42289 vs 33004 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6400
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6400 | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 717 | 795 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7651 | 11545 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 176 | 1115 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33004 | 42289 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1590.392 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6400 | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 24 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 | 6 February 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 279 | 287 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $815 | |
| Price now | $799.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.17 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1480 MHz |
| Compute units | 12 | |
| Core clock speed | 1923 MHz | 1202 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.130 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.565 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 74.27 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 111.4 GTexel/s | 165.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5400 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | 4x DisplayPort |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 5.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 192 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 7604 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Stereo | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||