AMD FirePro M4100 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro M4100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro M4100
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- 666.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 623 versus 465
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 74.162 versus 51.009
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 versus 3242
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 versus 3242
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 16 October 2013 versus 26 March 2013 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 623 versus 465 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.162 versus 51.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3242 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Environ 46% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 670 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 62.7 billion / sec versus 16.08 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
- 3.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,585 gflops versus 514.6 gflops
- 3.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3388 versus 1059
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9482 versus 5067
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.21 versus 15.905
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 561.43 versus 432.116
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.026 versus 1.48
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.868 versus 24.029
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3642 versus 3591
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3642 versus 3591
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 670 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 62.7 billion / sec versus 16.08 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,585 gflops versus 514.6 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3388 versus 1059 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9482 versus 5067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.21 versus 15.905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 561.43 versus 432.116 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 versus 1.48 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.868 versus 24.029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 versus 3591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 versus 3591 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M4100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD FirePro M4100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1059 | 3388 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 623 | 465 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5067 | 9482 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.905 | 25.21 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 432.116 | 561.43 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.48 | 2.026 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.029 | 30.868 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.162 | 51.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3591 | 3642 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3591 | 3642 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3426 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD FirePro M4100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Mars | GK106 |
Date de sortie | 16 October 2013 | 26 March 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 809 | 810 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 670 MHz | 980 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 514.6 gflops | 1,585 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16.08 GTexel / s | 62.7 billion / sec |
Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 2,540 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1033 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 134 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |