AMD FirePro M4150 vs ATI FirePro V4800
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M4150 and ATI FirePro V4800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4150
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 17.16 GTexel / s vs 15.5 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3600 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3604 vs 1672
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1764 vs 1512
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1764 vs 1512
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3326
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3326
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 October 2013 vs 26 April 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 GTexel / s vs 15.5 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 3600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3604 vs 1672 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 vs 1512 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 vs 1512 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3326 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V4800
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 715 MHz
- Around 4% higher pipelines: 400 vs 384
- Around 13% better floating-point performance: 620.0 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1204 vs 979
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 vs 172
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2211 vs 2181
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2211 vs 2181
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 715 MHz |
Pipelines | 400 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 620.0 gflops vs 549.1 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1204 vs 979 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 456 vs 172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2211 vs 2181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2211 vs 2181 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M4150
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V4800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro M4150 | ATI FirePro V4800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 979 | 1204 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 456 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3604 | 1672 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 | 1512 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 | 1512 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2181 | 2211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2181 | 2211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3326 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.886 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 321.782 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.529 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.184 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 56.777 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro M4150 | ATI FirePro V4800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Opal | Redwood |
Launch date | 16 October 2013 | 26 April 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1096 | 1099 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $189 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 775 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 620.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 400 |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 GTexel / s | 15.5 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 627 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 69 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |