AMD FirePro M8900 vs ATI FirePro V3800
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M8900 and ATI FirePro V3800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M8900
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 680 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 32.6 GTexel / s vs 13 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 960 vs 400
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 1,305.6 gflops vs 520.0 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.529 vs 3.432
- 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 760.858 vs 153.019
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.158 vs 0.29
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.149 vs 10.314
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 108.525 vs 48.552
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 April 2011 vs 26 April 2010 |
Core clock speed | 680 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 32.6 GTexel / s vs 13 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 960 vs 400 |
Floating-point performance | 1,305.6 gflops vs 520.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.529 vs 3.432 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 760.858 vs 153.019 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.158 vs 0.29 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.149 vs 10.314 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 108.525 vs 48.552 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V3800
- Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 43 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 43 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M8900
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V3800
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro M8900 | ATI FirePro V3800 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18738 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.529 | 3.432 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 760.858 | 153.019 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.158 | 0.29 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.149 | 10.314 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 108.525 | 48.552 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 321 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 179 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1572 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2958 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1572 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2958 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro M8900 | ATI FirePro V3800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Blackcomb | Redwood |
Launch date | 12 April 2011 | 26 April 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1405 | 1406 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 680 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,305.6 gflops | 520.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 960 | 400 |
Texture fill rate | 32.6 GTexel / s | 13 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 43 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,700 million | 627 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | n / a | |
Form factor | MXM-B | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 115 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |