AMD FirePro M8900 vs ATI FirePro V3800

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M8900 and ATI FirePro V3800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M8900

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
  • Around 5% higher core clock speed: 680 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 2.5x more texture fill rate: 32.6 GTexel / s vs 13 GTexel / s
  • 2.4x more pipelines: 960 vs 400
  • 2.5x better floating-point performance: 1,305.6 gflops vs 520.0 gflops
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
  • 2x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.529 vs 3.432
  • 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 760.858 vs 153.019
  • 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.158 vs 0.29
  • 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.149 vs 10.314
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 108.525 vs 48.552
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 12 April 2011 vs 26 April 2010
Core clock speed 680 MHz vs 650 MHz
Texture fill rate 32.6 GTexel / s vs 13 GTexel / s
Pipelines 960 vs 400
Floating-point performance 1,305.6 gflops vs 520.0 gflops
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 3600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 10.529 vs 3.432
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 760.858 vs 153.019
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.158 vs 0.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 26.149 vs 10.314
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 108.525 vs 48.552

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V3800

  • Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 43 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 43 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro M8900
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V3800

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10.529
3.432
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
760.858
153.019
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.158
0.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
26.149
10.314
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
108.525
48.552
Name AMD FirePro M8900 ATI FirePro V3800
Geekbench - OpenCL 18738
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 10.529 3.432
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 760.858 153.019
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.158 0.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 26.149 10.314
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 108.525 48.552
PassMark - G3D Mark 321
PassMark - G2D Mark 179
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1572
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2958
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1572
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2958

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD FirePro M8900 ATI FirePro V3800

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 TeraScale 2
Code name Blackcomb Redwood
Launch date 12 April 2011 26 April 2010
Place in performance rating 1405 1406
Type Mobile workstation Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $129

Technical info

Core clock speed 680 MHz 650 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,305.6 gflops 520.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 960 400
Texture fill rate 32.6 GTexel / s 13 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 43 Watt
Transistor count 1,700 million 627 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support n / a
Form factor MXM-B
Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None None
Length 168 mm

API support

DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.4 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 115 GB / s 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 3600 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3
Shared memory 0