NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M vs AMD FirePro M8900
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M and AMD FirePro M8900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 75 Watt
Launch date | 22 March 2012 vs 12 April 2011 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M8900
- 10x more pipelines: 960 vs 96
- 5.2x better floating-point performance: 1,305.6 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 7.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18738 vs 2407
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.529 vs 5.055
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 760.858 vs 215.004
- Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.158 vs 0.635
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.149 vs 10.393
- 5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 108.525 vs 19.903
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 960 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 1,305.6 gflops vs 253.4 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18738 vs 2407 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.529 vs 5.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 760.858 vs 215.004 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.158 vs 0.635 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.149 vs 10.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 108.525 vs 19.903 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M8900
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | AMD FirePro M8900 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 536 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 151 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2407 | 18738 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.055 | 10.529 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.004 | 760.858 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | 1.158 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.393 | 26.149 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.903 | 108.525 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 967 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2766 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 967 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2766 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | AMD FirePro M8900 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF108 | Blackcomb |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 | 12 April 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1407 | 1408 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops | 1,305.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 960 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,700 million |
Core clock speed | 680 MHz | |
Texture fill rate | 32.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | n / a |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Form factor | MXM-B | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
DirectX 11.2 | 12 API | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 115 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |