AMD FirePro S7150 vs AMD Radeon R7 250X

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro S7150 and AMD Radeon R7 250X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S7150

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• 3.1x more texture fill rate: 117.6 GTexel / s vs 38 GTexel / s
• 2.8x more pipelines: 1792 vs 640
• 3.1x better floating-point performance: 3,763 gflops vs 1,216 gflops
• 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
• 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1625 MHz
• Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3770 vs 2269
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6147 vs 3916
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4359 vs 3716
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6147 vs 3916
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4359 vs 3716

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250X

• Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 637 vs 414
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 32.22 vs 27.544
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 638.532 vs 570.969
• 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.963 vs 0.687
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.987 vs 23.637
• 5.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 583
• 5.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 583

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro S7150
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3770 2269
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	414 637
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.544 32.22
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	570.969 638.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.687 2.963
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.637 51.987
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6147 3916
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4359 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	583 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6147 3916
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4359 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	583 3358

Compare specifications (specs)