AMD FirePro S7150 versus AMD Radeon R7 250X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro S7150 and AMD Radeon R7 250X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro S7150
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 117.6 GTexel / s versus 38 GTexel / s
- 2.8x plus de pipelines: 1792 versus 640
- 3.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,763 gflops versus 1,216 gflops
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- 3.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 1625 MHz
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3770 versus 2269
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6147 versus 3916
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4359 versus 3716
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6147 versus 3916
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4359 versus 3716
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2016 versus 13 February 2014 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 117.6 GTexel / s versus 38 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 versus 640 |
Performance á point flottant | 3,763 gflops versus 1,216 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 1625 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3770 versus 2269 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6147 versus 3916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4359 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6147 versus 3916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4359 versus 3716 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 250X
- Environ 88% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 637 versus 414
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 32.22 versus 27.544
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 638.532 versus 570.969
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.963 versus 0.687
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.987 versus 23.637
- 5.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 583
- 5.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 583
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 637 versus 414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.22 versus 27.544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.532 versus 570.969 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.963 versus 0.687 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.987 versus 23.637 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 583 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro S7150
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD FirePro S7150 | AMD Radeon R7 250X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3770 | 2269 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 414 | 637 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27146 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.544 | 32.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 570.969 | 638.532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.687 | 2.963 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.637 | 51.987 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6147 | 3916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4359 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 583 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6147 | 3916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4359 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 583 | 3358 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.963 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD FirePro S7150 | AMD Radeon R7 250X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Tonga | Cape Verde |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2016 | 13 February 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,399 | $99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 660 | 663 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Prix maintenant | $260.70 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.25 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1050 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 3,763 gflops | 1,216 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 640 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 117.6 GTexel / s | 38 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 80 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,000 million | 1,500 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 640 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 210 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.0 GB / s | 96 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | 1625 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |