AMD FirePro V3900 vs ATI Radeon HD 4830

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro V3900 and ATI Radeon HD 4830 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V3900

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 575 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
• 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 237 vs 56

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4830

• Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 18.4 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 640 vs 480
• Around 18% better floating-point performance: 736.0 gflops vs 624.0 gflops
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 199 Watt
• Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 844 vs 640

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro V3900
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4830

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	640 844
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	237 56
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3354

Compare specifications (specs)