NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE vs AMD FirePro V3900

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE and AMD FirePro V3900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• 10x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 199 Watt
• Around 74% higher memory clock speed: 3140 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 706 vs 640
• Around 50% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2344 vs 1564
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.495 vs 4.646
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.649 vs 0.468
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1583 vs 1311
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2289 vs 1631
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1583 vs 1311
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2289 vs 1631

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V3900

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
• Around 63% better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 237 vs 173
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 279.435 vs 251.012
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.784 vs 13.333
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 58.58 vs 13.954
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3127
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3127

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V3900

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	706 640
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	173 237
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2344 1564
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.495 4.646
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	251.012 279.435
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.649 0.468
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.333 13.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.954 58.58
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1583 1311
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2289 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3127 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1583 1311
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2289 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3127 3358

Compare specifications (specs)