AMD FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro V4900 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V4900

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
• Around 28% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 625 MHz
• 2.5x more pipelines: 480 vs 192
• Around 60% better floating-point performance: 768.0 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
• Around 54% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2600 MHz
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1006 vs 947
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 320 vs 303
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 392.237 vs 258.26
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 17.874 vs 13.688
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 72.818 vs 19.02
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1747 vs 1600
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3753 vs 1682
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7745 vs 2668
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1747 vs 1600
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3753 vs 1682
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7745 vs 2668

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000

• Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 20 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
• Around 21% lower typical power consumption: 62 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3879 vs 1927
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.229 vs 6.303
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.885 vs 0.597

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro V4900
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1006 947
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	320 303
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1927 3879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.303 10.229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	392.237 258.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.597 0.885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.874 13.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	72.818 19.02
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1747 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3753 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7745 2668
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1747 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3753 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7745 2668

Compare specifications (specs)