AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 830M

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W2100 and NVIDIA GeForce 830M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W2100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 320 vs 256
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 315 vs 137
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 289.646 vs 156.544
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.794 vs 17.81

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 830M

• Around 72% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 630 MHz
• Around 69% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 680 MHz
• Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 18.4 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
• Around 35% better floating-point performance: 588.8 gflops vs 435.2 gflops
• 12.1x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 400 Watt
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1006 vs 859
• Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4213 vs 3710
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 16.955 vs 10.438
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.013 vs 0.991
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.443 vs 50.338
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1729 vs 1494
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3589 vs 2329
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1729 vs 1494
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3589 vs 2329

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W2100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 830M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	859 1006
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	315 137
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 4213
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.438 16.955
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	289.646 156.544
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.991 1.013
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.794 17.81
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	50.338 67.443
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 1729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2329 3589
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 1729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2329 3589
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3352

Compare specifications (specs)