NVIDIA GeForce 930M vs AMD FirePro W2100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 930M and AMD FirePro W2100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• Around 47% higher core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 630 MHz
• Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 941 MHz vs 680 MHz
• Around 66% higher texture fill rate: 22.58 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
• Around 66% better floating-point performance: 722.7 gflops vs 435.2 gflops
• 12.1x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 400 Watt
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1012 vs 883
• Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4974 vs 3715
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.344 vs 10.438
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.225 vs 0.991
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.899 vs 19.794
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.246 vs 50.338
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1987 vs 1494
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 vs 2329
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1987 vs 1494
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 vs 2329

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W2100

• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 321 vs 151
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 289.646 vs 166.907

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 930M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W2100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1012 883
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	151 321
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4974 3715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.344 10.438
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	166.907 289.646
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.225 0.991
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.899 19.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	84.246 50.338
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1987 1494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3706 2329
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1987 1494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3706 2329
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3346

Compare specifications (specs)