AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W2100 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W2100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 289.646 vs 265.424
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.794 vs 15.009
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 50.338 vs 38.219
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2329 vs 1631
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 1974
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2329 vs 1631
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 1974
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 August 2014 vs 1 March 2013 |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 289.646 vs 265.424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.794 vs 15.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 50.338 vs 38.219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2329 vs 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2329 vs 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 1974 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 630 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 30.53 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 68% better floating-point performance: 732.7 gflops vs 435.2 gflops
- 7.8x lower typical power consumption: 51 Watt vs 400 Watt
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1582 vs 859
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 385 vs 315
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4071 vs 3723
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.332 vs 10.438
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.093 vs 0.991
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2446 vs 1494
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2446 vs 1494
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 630 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 732.7 gflops vs 435.2 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt vs 400 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1582 vs 859 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 vs 315 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4071 vs 3723 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.332 vs 10.438 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.093 vs 0.991 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2446 vs 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2446 vs 1494 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W2100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W2100 | NVIDIA Quadro K2000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 859 | 1582 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 315 | 385 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3723 | 4071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.438 | 14.332 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 289.646 | 265.424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.991 | 1.093 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.794 | 15.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 50.338 | 38.219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1494 | 2446 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2329 | 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1494 | 2446 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2329 | 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 1974 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1058 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W2100 | NVIDIA Quadro K2000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Oland | GK107 |
Launch date | 12 August 2014 | 1 March 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1210 | 1212 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Price now | $164.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 680 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 630 MHz | 954 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 435.2 gflops | 732.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 13.6 GTexel / s | 30.53 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 51 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 2 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Low Profile / Half Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 202 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | n / a | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
Powerplay |