AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W2100 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W2100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 289.646 vs 265.424
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.794 vs 15.009
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 50.338 vs 38.219
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2329 vs 1631
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 1974
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2329 vs 1631
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 1974

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000

• Around 51% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 630 MHz
• 2.2x more texture fill rate: 30.53 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
• Around 68% better floating-point performance: 732.7 gflops vs 435.2 gflops
• 7.8x lower typical power consumption: 51 Watt vs 400 Watt
• 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1577 vs 883
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 382 vs 321
• Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4071 vs 3715
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.332 vs 10.438
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.093 vs 0.991
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2446 vs 1494
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2446 vs 1494

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W2100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	883 1577
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	321 382
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 4071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.438 14.332
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	289.646 265.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.991 1.093
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.794 15.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	50.338 38.219
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2329 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 1974
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2329 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 1974

Compare specifications (specs)