AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W2100 and NVIDIA Quadro K620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W2100

• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.794 vs 15.363
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3329
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3329
• Around 51% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1058 vs 702

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620

• Around 68% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 630 MHz
• Around 65% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 680 MHz
• Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
• Around 98% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 435.2 gflops
• 9.8x lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 400 Watt
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2220 vs 856
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 314
• Around 83% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6869 vs 3750
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.112 vs 10.438
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 297.631 vs 289.646
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.427 vs 0.991
• Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.125 vs 50.338
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 1494
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2490 vs 2329
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 1494
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2490 vs 2329

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W2100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	856 2220
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	314 480
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3750 6869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.438 22.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	289.646 297.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.991 1.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.794 15.363
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	50.338 99.125
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2329 2490
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2329 2490
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1058 702

Compare specifications (specs)