AMD FirePro W4100 vs Intel HD Graphics 4600

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4100 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 58% higher core clock speed: 630 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 4x more texture fill rate: 20.16 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
• 25.6x more pipelines: 512 vs 20
• 12.9x better floating-point performance: 645.1 gflops vs 50 gflops
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1504 vs 630
• Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 453 vs 314
• Around 70% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5447 vs 3210
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.65 vs 8.844
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 538.848 vs 171.17
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.631 vs 1.115
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.533 vs 10.385
• 6.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 75.309 vs 12.361
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 vs 988
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3399 vs 1702
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 vs 988
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3399 vs 1702

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 vs 1620
• Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 vs 1620

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4100
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1504 630
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	453 314
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5447 3210
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.65 8.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	538.848 171.17
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.631 1.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.533 10.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.309 12.361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1951 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3399 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1620 2808
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1951 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3399 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1620 2808

Compare specifications (specs)