AMD FirePro W4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 78% higher pipelines: 512 vs 288
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3828 MHz
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 vs 423
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.533 vs 27.232
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 75.309 vs 50.114
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3399 vs 3114
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3399 vs 3114

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 736 MHz vs 630 MHz
• Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 35.33 GTexel / s vs 20.16 GTexel / s
• Around 31% better floating-point performance: 847.9 gflops vs 645.1 gflops
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1914 vs 1516
• Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7009 vs 5489
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.456 vs 15.65
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 618.773 vs 538.848
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.693 vs 1.631
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 1951
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1620
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 1951
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1620

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1516 1914
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	456 423
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5489 7009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.65 18.456
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	538.848 618.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.631 1.693
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.533 27.232
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.309 50.114
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1951 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3399 3114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1620 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1951 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3399 3114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1620 3356

Compare specifications (specs)