AMD FirePro W4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 64 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 800x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 453 vs 368
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5447 vs 4493
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.65 vs 12.582
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 538.848 vs 364.463
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.631 vs 1.254
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.533 vs 18.386
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 75.309 vs 23.499
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 August 2014 vs 27 November 2013 |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 64 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 453 vs 368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5447 vs 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.65 vs 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 538.848 vs 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.631 vs 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.533 vs 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 75.309 vs 23.499 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Around 68% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 630 MHz
- Around 68% higher texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 20.16 GTexel / s
- Around 26% better floating-point performance: 812.5 gflops vs 645.1 gflops
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 vs 1504
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 1951
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 3399
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 1620
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 1951
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 3399
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 1620
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 630 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec vs 20.16 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops vs 645.1 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 vs 1504 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 vs 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 vs 3399 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 vs 1620 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 vs 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 vs 3399 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 vs 1620 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W4100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1504 | 1749 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 453 | 368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5447 | 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.65 | 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 538.848 | 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.631 | 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.533 | 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 75.309 | 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3399 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1620 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3399 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1620 | 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W4100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Cape Verde | GK106 |
Launch date | 13 August 2014 | 27 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 965 | 1003 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Price now | $144.81 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 630 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 645.1 gflops | 812.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 20.16 GTexel / s | 33.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 64 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 2,540 million |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Form factor | Low Profile / Half Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 171 mm | 5.70" (14.5 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
Powerplay | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |