AMD FirePro W4100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4100 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
• Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 51 Watt
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 460 vs 406
• Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5476 vs 3973
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.65 vs 14.283
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 538.848 vs 386.006
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.631 vs 1.018
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.533 vs 15.605
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 75.309 vs 31.155

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

• Around 51% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 630 MHz
• Around 51% higher texture fill rate: 30.53 GTexel / s vs 20.16 GTexel / s
• Around 14% better floating-point performance: 732.7 gflops vs 645.1 gflops
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1586 vs 1526
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2646 vs 1951
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3493 vs 3399
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 1620
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2646 vs 1951
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3493 vs 3399
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 1620

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1526 1586
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	460 406
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5476 3973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.65 14.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	538.848 386.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.631 1.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.533 15.605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.309 31.155
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1951 2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3399 3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1620 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1951 2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3399 3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1620 3339

Compare specifications (specs)