AMD FirePro W5000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W5000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 570 vs 530
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3666
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3306
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3666
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3306
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 August 2012 vs 22 March 2012 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 570 vs 530 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3306 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1006 MHz vs 825 MHz
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 128.8 billion / sec vs 39.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 768
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 3,090.4 gflops vs 1,267 gflops
- Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 195 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 88% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 3200 MHz
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5566 vs 2979
- Around 85% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18412 vs 9969
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 989.685 vs 771.327
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.645 vs 2.758
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7222 vs 4308
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7222 vs 4308
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1006 MHz vs 825 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 128.8 billion / sec vs 39.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 768 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,090.4 gflops vs 1,267 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 195 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 3200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5566 vs 2979 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18412 vs 9969 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 989.685 vs 771.327 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.645 vs 2.758 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7222 vs 4308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7222 vs 4308 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro W5000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2979 | 5566 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 570 | 530 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9969 | 18412 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 771.327 | 989.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.758 | 4.645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4308 | 7222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4308 | 7222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.086 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.577 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2004 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro W5000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Pitcairn | GK104 |
| Launch date | 7 August 2012 | 22 March 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | $499 |
| Place in performance rating | 559 | 560 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Price now | $579.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.83 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1006 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,267 gflops | 3,090.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 39.6 GTexel / s | 128.8 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 195 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3,540 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1058 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| DisplayPort count | 2 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Form factor | Full Height / Half Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 183 mm | 10.0" (25.4 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2048 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD FirePro W5000 with others
AMDFirePro W5000 vs
ATIFireMV 2250
AMDFirePro W5000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
AMDFirePro W5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680
AMDFirePro W5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M
AMDFirePro W5000 vs
NVIDIAP104-100
AMDFirePro W5000 vs
NVIDIACMP 50HX
