NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M vs AMD FirePro W5000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M and AMD FirePro W5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 924 MHz vs 825 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 83.04 GTexel / s vs 39.6 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 2,657 gflops vs 1,267 gflops
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 81 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5709 vs 2985
- Around 91% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19031 vs 9969
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1113.788 vs 771.327
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.157 vs 2.758
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8546 vs 4308
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8546 vs 4308
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 October 2014 vs 7 August 2012 |
Core clock speed | 924 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 83.04 GTexel / s vs 39.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 2,657 gflops vs 1,267 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 81 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5709 vs 2985 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19031 vs 9969 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1113.788 vs 771.327 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.157 vs 2.758 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8546 vs 4308 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8546 vs 4308 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5000
- Around 28% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 2500 MHz
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 385
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3342
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3342
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 2500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 vs 385 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3342 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | AMD FirePro W5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5709 | 2985 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 | 569 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19031 | 9969 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 59.428 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1113.788 | 771.327 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.157 | 2.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.101 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.909 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8546 | 4308 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8546 | 4308 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2286 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | AMD FirePro W5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 7 October 2014 | 7 August 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,560.89 | $599 |
Place in performance rating | 558 | 559 |
Price now | $1,899 | |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.99 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 924 MHz | 825 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1280 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,657 gflops | 1,267 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 83.04 GTexel / s | 39.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 81 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
DisplayPort count | 2 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Form factor | Full Height / Half Length | |
Length | 183 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 120 GB / s | 102.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI |