AMD FirePro W5000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro W5000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W5000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 versus 530
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 versus 3666
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 3306
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 versus 3666
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 3306
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 August 2012 versus 22 March 2012 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 versus 530 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3306 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
- Environ 22% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1006 MHz versus 825 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 128.8 billion / sec versus 39.6 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 768
- 2.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,090.4 gflops versus 1,267 gflops
- Environ 79% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 195 Watt versus 350 Watt
- Environ 88% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 3200 MHz
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5566 versus 2976
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 18397 versus 9969
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 989.685 versus 771.327
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.645 versus 2.758
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7222 versus 4308
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7222 versus 4308
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1006 MHz versus 825 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.8 billion / sec versus 39.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 768 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,090.4 gflops versus 1,267 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 195 Watt versus 350 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 3200 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5566 versus 2976 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18397 versus 9969 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 989.685 versus 771.327 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.645 versus 2.758 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7222 versus 4308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7222 versus 4308 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD FirePro W5000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2976 | 5566 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 | 530 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9969 | 18397 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 771.327 | 989.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.758 | 4.645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4308 | 7222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4308 | 7222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.086 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.577 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2004 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD FirePro W5000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Pitcairn | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 7 August 2012 | 22 March 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599 | $499 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 559 | 560 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $579.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 12.83 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 825 MHz | 1006 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,267 gflops | 3,090.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 39.6 GTexel / s | 128.8 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 195 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | 3,540 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1058 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Half Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 183 mm | 10.0" (25.4 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | Two 6-pin |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 3-way | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2048 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 102.4 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3200 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD FirePro W5000 avec des autres
AMDFirePro W5000 vs
ATIFireMV 2250
AMDFirePro W5000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
AMDFirePro W5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680
AMDFirePro W5000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
AMDFirePro W5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M
AMDFirePro W5000 vs
NVIDIACMP 50HX
