NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs AMD FirePro W5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and AMD FirePro W5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 81% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 825 MHz
• Around 96% higher texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 39.6 GTexel / s
• Around 96% better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 1,267 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 350 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 2.2x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 3200 MHz
• Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5919 vs 2974
• Around 96% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20098 vs 10275
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 vs 771.327
• Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 2.758
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 4308
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 4308

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5000

• Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 568 vs 323
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3687
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3336
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3687
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3336

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5919 2974
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	323 568
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	20098 10275
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	843.503 771.327
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.071 2.758
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 4308
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 4308
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3359

Compare specifications (specs)