AMD FirePro W5100 vs ATI Radeon HD 5770

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W5100 and ATI Radeon HD 5770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 9% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 850 MHz
• Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 44.64 GTexel / s vs 34.0 GTexel / s
• Around 5% better floating-point performance: 1,428 gflops vs 1,360.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 108 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 4800 MHz
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2978 vs 1345
• Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 531 vs 335
• Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11724 vs 10495
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.15 vs 9.373
• Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 838.518 vs 459.025
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.199 vs 0.906
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.354 vs 27.022
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 163.258 vs 48.793
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4397 vs 2636
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 vs 2673
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2799
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4397 vs 2636
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 vs 2673
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2799

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5770

• Around 4% higher pipelines: 800 vs 768

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5100
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5770

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2978 1345
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	531 335
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11724 10495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.15 9.373
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	838.518 459.025
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.199 0.906
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	57.354 27.022
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	163.258 48.793
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4397 2636
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 2673
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 2799
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4397 2636
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 2673
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 2799

Compare specifications (specs)