AMD FirePro W5100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W5100 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 46% higher texture fill rate: 44.64 GTexel / s vs 30.53 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
• Around 95% better floating-point performance: 1,428 gflops vs 732.7 gflops
• Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 51 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
• Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2978 vs 1578
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 531 vs 385
• 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11724 vs 4071
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.15 vs 14.332
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 838.518 vs 265.424
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.199 vs 1.093
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.354 vs 15.009
• 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 163.258 vs 38.219
• Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4397 vs 2446
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 vs 1631
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1974
• Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4397 vs 2446
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 vs 1631
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1974

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000

• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 930 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2978 1578
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	531 385
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11724 4071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.15 14.332
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	838.518 265.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.199 1.093
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	57.354 15.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	163.258 38.219
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4397 2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 1974
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4397 2446
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 1974

Compare specifications (specs)