AMD FirePro W5170M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W5170M and NVIDIA Quadro K3100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5170M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 706 MHz
- Around 9% better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 1,084 gflops
- Around 41% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 3200 MHz
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 353 vs 323
- Around 37% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8322 vs 6076
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3189 vs 2502
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3189 vs 2502
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 2616
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 2616
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 August 2014 vs 23 July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 706 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops vs 1,084 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 3200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 353 vs 323 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8322 vs 6076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3189 vs 2502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3189 vs 2502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 2616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 2616 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
- Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 45.18 GTexel / s vs 37 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2270 vs 1814
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3721 vs 3409
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3721 vs 3409
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 45.18 GTexel / s vs 37 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2270 vs 1814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3721 vs 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3721 vs 3409 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5170M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W5170M | NVIDIA Quadro K3100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1814 | 2270 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 353 | 323 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8322 | 6076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3409 | 3721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3409 | 3721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3189 | 2502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3189 | 2502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 2616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 2616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.239 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 426.305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.468 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.251 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.135 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W5170M | NVIDIA Quadro K3100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tropo | GK104 |
Launch date | 25 August 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 680 | 1060 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,999 | |
Price now | $1,999 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.38 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 706 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | 1,084 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s | 45.18 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,540 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Shader Model | 5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 102.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |