AMD Radeon 530 vs AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 530 and AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 530
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 3964.5x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 6.2 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 160
- 3.2x better floating-point performance: 800 GFLOPs vs 248.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1028 vs 332
- 6.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5015 vs 770
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 5 May 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 6.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 800 GFLOPs vs 248.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1028 vs 332 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5015 vs 770 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 545 vs 176
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 545 vs 176 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 530
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 530 | AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1028 | 332 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 176 | 545 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5015 | 770 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2021 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2246 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2021 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2246 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.002 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 110.092 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.228 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.678 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.621 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 530 | AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Meso | Caicos |
Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 3rd Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1096 | 1099 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 1024 MHz | 775 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 800 GFLOPs | 248.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 160 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
Render output units | 8 | |
Stream Processors | 320/384 | |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 6.2 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 20/24 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3/GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |