AMD Radeon 530 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 530 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 530
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 800 GFLOPs vs 240.0 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1016 vs 479
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 175 vs 141
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5026 vs 2229
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2021 vs 999
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3257
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2021 vs 999
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3257
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 1 October 2012 |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 800 GFLOPs vs 240.0 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1016 vs 479 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 175 vs 141 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5026 vs 2229 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2021 vs 999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3257 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2021 vs 999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3257 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2333 vs 2246
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2333 vs 2246
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2333 vs 2246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2333 vs 2246 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 530
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 530 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1016 | 479 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 175 | 141 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5026 | 2229 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2021 | 999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2246 | 2333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3257 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2021 | 999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2246 | 2333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3257 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 530 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Meso | GF117 |
| Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 3rd Gen | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 1 October 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1112 | 1208 |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 800 GFLOPs | 240.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 8 | |
| Stream Processors | 320/384 | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | |
| Texture Units | 20/24 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Transistor count | 585 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3/GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 530 with others
AMDRadeon 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce2 Ti
AMDRadeon 530 vs
ATIRadeon 9600 XT
AMDRadeon 530 vs
ATIRadeon 9600 PRO
AMDRadeon 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX
AMDRadeon 530 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M440
AMDRadeon 530 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M420
