AMD Radeon 535 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 535 Mobile and AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 1194.2x more texture fill rate: 24.60 GTexel/s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 19% better floating-point performance: 784.1 gflops vs 659.2 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1071 vs 851
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2343 vs 1430
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2343 vs 1430
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2405 vs 1843
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2405 vs 1843
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 30 June 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s vs 20.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops vs 659.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1071 vs 851 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2343 vs 1430 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2343 vs 1430 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2405 vs 1843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2405 vs 1843 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 223 vs 193
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7050 vs 6339
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5002 vs 3346
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5002 vs 3346
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 223 vs 193 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7050 vs 6339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5002 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5002 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 | 223 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1071 | 851 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6339 | 7050 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2343 | 1430 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2343 | 1430 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2405 | 1843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2405 | 1843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 5002 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 5002 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Topaz | Hainan |
Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 30 June 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 992 | 1019 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops | 659.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
Render output units | 8 | |
Stream Processors | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s | 20.6 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 24 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 834 M | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 16 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |