AMD Radeon 535 Mobile vs Intel Iris Graphics 550
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 535 Mobile and Intel Iris Graphics 550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2405 vs 1290
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2405 vs 1290
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3157
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3157
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 1 September 2015 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2405 vs 1290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2405 vs 1290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3157 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 550
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1024 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 305 vs 193
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1432 vs 1071
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7182 vs 6339
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2675 vs 2343
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2675 vs 2343
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1024 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 305 vs 193 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1432 vs 1071 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7182 vs 6339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2675 vs 2343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2675 vs 2343 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
GPU 2: Intel Iris Graphics 550
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | Intel Iris Graphics 550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 | 305 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1071 | 1432 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6339 | 7182 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2343 | 2675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2343 | 2675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2405 | 1290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2405 | 1290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3157 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | Intel Iris Graphics 550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Generation 9.0 |
Code name | Topaz | Skylake GT3e |
Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 1 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 992 | 952 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
Render output units | 8 | |
Stream Processors | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 24 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 834 M | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
Quick Sync |