AMD Radeon 535 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 535 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon 535 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 535 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
805.8x more texture fill rate: 24.60 GTexel/s vs 30.53 GTexel / s
Around 7% better floating-point performance: 784.1 gflops vs 732.7 gflops
Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 51 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 4000 MHz
Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6339 vs 3883

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 April 2017 vs 1 March 2013
Texture fill rate	24.60 GTexel/s vs 30.53 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	784.1 gflops vs 732.7 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 51 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz vs 4000 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	6339 vs 3883
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3346 vs 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3346 vs 3339

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Around 31% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 730 MHz
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 410 vs 193
Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1577 vs 1071
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2646 vs 2343
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2646 vs 2343
Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3493 vs 2405
Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3493 vs 2405

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	954 MHz vs 730 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	410 vs 193
PassMark - G3D Mark	1577 vs 1071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2646 vs 2343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2646 vs 2343
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3493 vs 2405
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3493 vs 2405

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

193

410

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1071

1577

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

6339

3883

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2343

2646

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2343

2646

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2405

3493

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2405

3493

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3346

3339

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3346

3339

Name	AMD Radeon 535 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
PassMark - G2D Mark	193	410
PassMark - G3D Mark	1071	1577
Geekbench - OpenCL	6339	3883
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2343	2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2343	2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2405	3493
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2405	3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3346	3339
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3346	3339
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		14.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		386.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		15.605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		31.155

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon 535 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Kepler
Code name	Topaz	GK107
Design	Radeon 500 Series
Launch date	18 April 2017	1 March 2013
Place in performance rating	992	965
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$599
Price now		$464
Value for money (0-100)		4.14
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz
Compute units	6
Core clock speed	730 MHz	954 MHz
Floating-point performance	784.1 gflops	732.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	384
Pixel fill rate	8.20 GP/s
Render output units	8
Stream Processors	384
Texture fill rate	24.60 GTexel/s	30.53 GTexel / s
Texture Units	24
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	51 Watt
Transistor count	834 M	1,270 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length		202 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	48 GB/s	64 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support