AMD Radeon 620 vs AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 7681.3x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 384 vs 128
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 205 vs 77
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 934 vs 271
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 23 November 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 128 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 vs 77 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 934 vs 271 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 930 vs 694
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 930 vs 694
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1631 vs 1116
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1631 vs 1116
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 930 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 930 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1631 vs 1116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1631 vs 1116 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 620 | AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 694 | 930 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 694 | 930 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1116 | 1631 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1116 | 1631 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 | 77 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 934 | 271 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1203 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.197 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1322.192 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.774 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.241 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 224.569 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 620 | AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 24 | Kalindi |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 23 November 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1247 | 1351 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 128 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1550 million | 1,178 million |
| Floating-point performance | 102.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |


