AMD Radeon 620 vs AMD Radeon Vega 3

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and AMD Radeon Vega 3 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • 2.4x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • 2048.3x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 12 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
  • Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1991 vs 1412
  • Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1991 vs 1412
  • Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 897 vs 890
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 May 2019 vs 13 February 2018
Core clock speed 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed 1024 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s vs 12 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 192
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1991 vs 1412
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1991 vs 1412
PassMark - G3D Mark 897 vs 890

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 3

  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2111 vs 694
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2111 vs 694
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3174 vs 1116
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3174 vs 1116
  • Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 306 vs 205
Specifications (specs)
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2111 vs 694
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2111 vs 694
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3174 vs 1116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3174 vs 1116
PassMark - G2D Mark 306 vs 205

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega 3

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1991
1412
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1991
1412
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
694
2111
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
694
2111
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1116
3174
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1116
3174
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
205
306
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
897
890
Name AMD Radeon 620 AMD Radeon Vega 3
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1991 1412
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1991 1412
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 694 2111
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 694 2111
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1116 3174
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1116 3174
PassMark - G2D Mark 205 306
PassMark - G3D Mark 897 890
Geekbench - OpenCL 3932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 10.049
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 183.156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.75
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 18.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 60.006
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 418

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon 620 AMD Radeon Vega 3

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 GCN 5.0
Code name Polaris 24 Owl
Launch date 13 May 2019 13 February 2018
Place in performance rating 1248 1264
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1024 MHz 1000 MHz
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 730 MHz 300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 786.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines 384 192
Pixel fill rate 8.192 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s 12 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 15 Watt
Transistor count 1550 million 4,940 million
Floating-point performance 384.0 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 IGP
Supplementary power connectors None None
Width IGP

API support

DirectX 12
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6
Shader Model 6.3
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.40 GB/s
Memory bus width 64 bit
Memory clock speed 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
Memory type DDR3 System Shared