AMD Radeon 620 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 3 January 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1024 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2652 vs 1991
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2652 vs 1991
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1564 vs 694
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1564 vs 694
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 1116
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 1116
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 358 vs 205
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1608 vs 934
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1024 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2652 vs 1991 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2652 vs 1991 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1564 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1564 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 1116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 1116 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 358 vs 205 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1608 vs 934 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 620 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 | 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 | 2652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 694 | 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 694 | 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1116 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1116 | 3340 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 | 358 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 934 | 1608 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7151 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 620 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Code name | Polaris 24 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 3 January 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 1247 | 862 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1550 million | 189 million |
| Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||

