AMD Radeon 625 vs AMD Radeon HD 6770M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and AMD Radeon HD 6770M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 725 MHz
• 1412.6x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 17.4 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1077 vs 964
• 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.876 vs 4.817
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 322.556 vs 234.842
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.478 vs 0.393
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.22 vs 15.475
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.423 vs 33.71

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6770M

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
• Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 4x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 209
• Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8338 vs 6656
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3044 vs 2920
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 3215
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3044 vs 2920
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 3215

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1077 964
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	209 572
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6656 8338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.876 4.817
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	322.556 234.842
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.478 0.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.22 15.475
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	70.423 33.71
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2920 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3215 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2920 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3215 3348

Compare specifications (specs)