AMD Radeon 625 vs AMD Radeon HD 8670D

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and AMD Radeon HD 8670D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon 625

AMD Radeon HD 8670D

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1077 vs 533
Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 209 vs 186
3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6656 vs 2087
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2032 vs 920
Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 vs 1980
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2032 vs 920
Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 vs 1980

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 May 2019 vs 4 June 2013
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 32 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1077 vs 533
PassMark - G2D Mark	209 vs 186
Geekbench - OpenCL	6656 vs 2087
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2032 vs 920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2920 vs 1980
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2032 vs 920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2920 vs 1980

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8670D

Around 16% higher core clock speed: 844 MHz vs 730 MHz
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3215
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3215

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	844 MHz vs 730 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3340 vs 3215
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3340 vs 3215

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8670D

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1077

533

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

209

186

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

6656

2087

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2032

920

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2920

1980

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3215

3340

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2032

920

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2920

1980

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3215

3340

Name	AMD Radeon 625	AMD Radeon HD 8670D
PassMark - G3D Mark	1077	533
PassMark - G2D Mark	209	186
Geekbench - OpenCL	6656	2087
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	18.876
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	322.556
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.478
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	32.22
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	70.423
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2032	920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2920	1980
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3215	3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2032	920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2920	1980
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3215	3340

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon 625	AMD Radeon HD 8670D
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Terascale 3
Code name	Polaris 24	Richland
Launch date	13 May 2019	4 June 2013
Place in performance rating	1134	1206
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz
Compute units	6
Core clock speed	730 MHz	844 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	32 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	49.15 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	786.4 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	786.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines	384	384
Pixel fill rate	8.192 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	24.58 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None
Width	IGP
API support
DirectX	12	11
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6
Shader Model	6.3
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.40 GB/s
Memory bus width	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
Memory type	DDR3
Shared memory		1