AMD Radeon 625 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 783.8x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 31.36 GTexel / s
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6656 vs 4982
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.876 vs 12.449
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.478 vs 1.295
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.22 vs 24.566
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.423 vs 28.025
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 25 June 2013 |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 31.36 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 vs 4982 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 vs 12.449 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 vs 1.295 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 vs 24.566 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 vs 28.025 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 730 MHz
- 6x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1687 vs 1077
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 322 vs 209
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 455.796 vs 322.556
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3093 vs 2032
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 vs 2920
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 3215
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3093 vs 2032
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 vs 2920
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 3215
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 730 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1687 vs 1077 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 322 vs 209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 455.796 vs 322.556 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3093 vs 2032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3504 vs 2920 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 vs 3215 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3093 vs 2032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3504 vs 2920 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 vs 3215 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 625 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1077 | 1687 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 322 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 | 4982 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | 12.449 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | 455.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | 1.295 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | 24.566 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | 28.025 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | 3093 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | 3504 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | 3093 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | 3504 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 | 3344 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2148 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 625 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Polaris 24 | GK107 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 25 June 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1134 | 985 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 31.36 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 86.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 5400 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 625 with others
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce2 Ultra
AMDRadeon 625 vs
ATIRadeon 8500
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 420 Go
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450
AMDRadeon 625 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750
AMDRadeon 625 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560 (Laptop)
