AMD Radeon 625 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon 625 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon 625
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 10 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 24.58 GTexel/s versus 31.36 GTexel / s
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6656 versus 4982
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.876 versus 12.449
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.478 versus 1.295
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.22 versus 24.566
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.423 versus 28.025
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 May 2019 versus 25 June 2013 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.58 GTexel/s versus 31.36 GTexel / s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 versus 4982 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 versus 12.449 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 versus 1.295 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 versus 24.566 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 versus 28.025 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
- Environ 34% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 730 MHz
- 6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5400 MHz versus 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1687 versus 1077
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 322 versus 209
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 455.796 versus 322.556
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3093 versus 2032
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 versus 2920
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 versus 3215
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3093 versus 2032
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 versus 2920
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 versus 3215
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 730 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5400 MHz versus 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1687 versus 1077 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 322 versus 209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 455.796 versus 322.556 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3093 versus 2032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3504 versus 2920 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 versus 3215 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3093 versus 2032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3504 versus 2920 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 versus 3215 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon 625 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1077 | 1687 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 322 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 | 4982 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | 12.449 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | 455.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | 1.295 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | 24.566 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | 28.025 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | 3093 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | 3504 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | 3093 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | 3504 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 | 3344 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2148 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon 625 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Polaris 24 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 13 May 2019 | 25 June 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1134 | 985 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1024 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 6 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 730 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.58 GTexel/s | 31.36 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 752.6 gflops | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Largeur | IGP | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.40 GB/s | 86.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 5400 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon 625 avec des autres
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce2 Ultra
AMDRadeon 625 vs
ATIRadeon 8500
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 420 Go
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450
AMDRadeon 625 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750
AMDRadeon 625 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560 (Laptop)
