AMD Radeon 625 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and NVIDIA Quadro 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 42% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 513 MHz
• 1089.1x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 22.57 GTexel / s
• Around 9% higher pipelines: 384 vs 352
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 152 Watt
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.876 vs 16.451
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.22 vs 17.065
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.423 vs 46.591

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5000

• Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 2560 MB vs 2 GB
• 3.3x more memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
• Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1932 vs 1077
• Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 385 vs 209
• Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7468 vs 6656
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 511.131 vs 322.556
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.925 vs 1.478
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2602 vs 2032
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3104 vs 2920
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3316 vs 3215
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2602 vs 2032
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3104 vs 2920
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3316 vs 3215

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1077 1932
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	209 385
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6656 7468
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.876 16.451
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	322.556 511.131
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.478 1.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.22 17.065
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	70.423 46.591
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2032 2602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2920 3104
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3215 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2032 2602
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2920 3104
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3215 3316

Compare specifications (specs)