AMD Radeon 630 vs AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 630 and AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 1218 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 2082.3x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3467 vs 1935
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3467 vs 1935
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 2380
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 2380
- Around 71% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9651 vs 5635
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1269 vs 935
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 730 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3467 vs 1935 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3467 vs 1935 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 2380 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 2380 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3354 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9651 vs 5635 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1269 vs 935 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
- 2.6x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 338 vs 221
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 vs 221 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 630 | AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3467 | 1935 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3467 | 1935 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 2380 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 2380 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3354 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9651 | 5635 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 221 | 338 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1269 | 935 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 630 | AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 23 | Oland |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 759 | 895 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 18.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 1,040 million |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 73.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 4600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 630 with others
AMDRadeon 630 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1700
AMDRadeon 630 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIATesla M2070-Q
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIATesla C2070
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
