AMD Radeon 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 823 MHz
- Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 1218 MHz vs 797 MHz
- 382.2x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 102.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 122 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3679
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3679
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 11 May 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 823 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz vs 797 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 122 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- 3x more pipelines: 1536 vs 512
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4868 vs 3467
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4868 vs 3467
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12496 vs 9651
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 413 vs 221
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3810 vs 1269
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 512 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 vs 3467 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 vs 3467 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12496 vs 9651 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 vs 221 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3810 vs 1269 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3467 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3467 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3351 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9651 | 12496 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 221 | 413 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1269 | 3810 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.616 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.832 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 78.867 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Polaris 23 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 11 May 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 759 | 771 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 3,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 2500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 630 with others
AMDRadeon 630 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1700
AMDRadeon 630 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIATesla M2070-Q
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIATesla C2070
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
