AMD FirePro W4170M vs AMD Radeon E8860

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4170M and AMD Radeon E8860 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4170M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
  • Around 43% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 575 MHz
  • Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 900 MHz vs 625 MHz
  • Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2802 vs 1655
  • Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2802 vs 1655
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 28 April 2014 vs 25 January 2014
Core clock speed 825 MHz vs 575 MHz
Boost clock speed 900 MHz vs 625 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2802 vs 1655
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2802 vs 1655

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8860

  • Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 25 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
  • Around 16% better floating-point performance: 800.0 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
  • Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 4000 MHz
  • Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1686 vs 1056
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 436 vs 211
  • 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26300 vs 6460
  • Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.395 vs 15.502
  • Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4345 vs 2689
  • Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4345 vs 2689
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 25 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 640 vs 384
Floating-point performance 800.0 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
Memory clock speed 4500 MHz vs 4000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1686 vs 1056
PassMark - G2D Mark 436 vs 211
Geekbench - OpenCL 26300 vs 6460
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 20.395 vs 15.502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 4345 vs 2689
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 4345 vs 2689

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4170M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E8860

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1056
1686
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
211
436
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6460
26300
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15.502
20.395
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2802
1655
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2802
1655
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2689
4345
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2689
4345
Name AMD FirePro W4170M AMD Radeon E8860
PassMark - G3D Mark 1056 1686
PassMark - G2D Mark 211 436
Geekbench - OpenCL 6460 26300
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 15.502 20.395
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2802 1655
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2802 1655
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2689 4345
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2689 4345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 529.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.803
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 47.86
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1246
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1246

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD FirePro W4170M AMD Radeon E8860

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Mars Venus
Launch date 28 April 2014 25 January 2014
Place in performance rating 1016 1017
Type Mobile workstation Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 900 MHz 625 MHz
Core clock speed 825 MHz 575 MHz
Floating-point performance 691.2 gflops 800.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 640
Texture fill rate 21.6 GTexel / s 25 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1,040 million 1,500 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 37 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 64 GB / s 72 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz 4500 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AppAcceleration
Enduro
Powerplay