AMD FirePro W4170M vs AMD Radeon E8860
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4170M and AMD Radeon E8860 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4170M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 900 MHz vs 625 MHz
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2802 vs 1655
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2802 vs 1655
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 April 2014 vs 25 January 2014 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2802 vs 1655 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2802 vs 1655 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8860
- Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 25 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- Around 16% better floating-point performance: 800.0 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1686 vs 1056
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 436 vs 211
- 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26300 vs 6460
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.395 vs 15.502
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4345 vs 2689
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4345 vs 2689
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 25 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1686 vs 1056 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 436 vs 211 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26300 vs 6460 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.395 vs 15.502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4345 vs 2689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4345 vs 2689 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4170M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E8860
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W4170M | AMD Radeon E8860 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1056 | 1686 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 211 | 436 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6460 | 26300 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.502 | 20.395 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2802 | 1655 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2802 | 1655 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2689 | 4345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2689 | 4345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 529.248 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.683 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.803 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.86 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1246 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1246 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W4170M | AMD Radeon E8860 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Mars | Venus |
Launch date | 28 April 2014 | 25 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1016 | 1017 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | 625 MHz |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | 25 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,500 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 37 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro | ||
Powerplay |