AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9550 MXM and NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 930 MHz
  • Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 1180 MHz
  • Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 182.3 GTexel / s vs 151.0 GTexel / s
  • Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
  • Around 21% better floating-point performance: 5,834 gflops vs 4,833 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 225 Watt
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
Launch date 27 September 2016 vs 30 August 2015
Core clock speed 1120 MHz vs 930 MHz
Boost clock speed 1266 MHz vs 1180 MHz
Texture fill rate 182.3 GTexel / s vs 151.0 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2304 vs 2048
Floating-point performance 5,834 gflops vs 4,833 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 95 Watt vs 225 Watt
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 1 GB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q

  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6674 vs 6622
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3597
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3208
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6674 vs 6622
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3597
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3208
Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6674 vs 6622
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 vs 3597
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 3208
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6674 vs 6622
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 vs 3597
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 3208

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6622
6674
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3597
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3208
3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6622
6674
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3597
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3208
3358
Name AMD Radeon E9550 MXM NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q
Geekbench - OpenCL 36624
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 112.64
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1474.586
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 9.473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 96.618
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 507.291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6622 6674
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3597 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3208 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6622 6674
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3597 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3208 3358
PassMark - G3D Mark 3695
PassMark - G2D Mark 181

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Maxwell 2.0
Code name Ellesmere GM204
Launch date 27 September 2016 30 August 2015
Place in performance rating 515 512
Type Desktop Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1266 MHz 1180 MHz
Core clock speed 1120 MHz 930 MHz
Floating-point performance 5,834 gflops 4,833 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 2304 2048
Texture fill rate 182.3 GTexel / s 151.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 95 Watt 225 Watt
Transistor count 5,700 million 5,200 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 8-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB / s 160.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz 5012 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5