AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9550 MXM and NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Around 90% higher core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 589 MHz
  • 77.4x more texture fill rate: 182.3 GTexel / s vs 2.356 GTexel / s
  • 288x more pipelines: 2304 vs 8
  • 260.1x better floating-point performance: 5,834 gflops vs 22.432 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • 16x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 512 MB
  • 6.3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 800 MHz
Launch date 27 September 2016 vs 26 November 2009
Core clock speed 1120 MHz vs 589 MHz
Texture fill rate 182.3 GTexel / s vs 2.356 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2304 vs 8
Floating-point performance 5,834 gflops vs 22.432 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz vs 800 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

  • 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 31 Watt vs 95 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 31 Watt vs 95 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

Name AMD Radeon E9550 MXM NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
Geekbench - OpenCL 36624
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 112.64
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1474.586
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 9.473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 96.618
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 507.291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6622
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3597
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3208
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6622
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3597
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3208
PassMark - G2D Mark 309
PassMark - G3D Mark 126

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Tesla 2.0
Code name Ellesmere GT218
Launch date 27 September 2016 26 November 2009
Place in performance rating 518 521
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1266 MHz
Core clock speed 1120 MHz 589 MHz
Floating-point performance 5,834 gflops 22.432 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 2304 8
Texture fill rate 182.3 GTexel / s 2.356 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 95 Watt 31 Watt
Transistor count 5,700 million 260 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None
Length 168 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 10.1
OpenGL 4.5 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB / s 6.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz 800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR2