AMD Radeon HD 6250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6250 and NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.5x more pipelines: 80 vs 32
- Around 16% better floating-point performance: 104 gflops vs 89.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 / 512 MB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz
Launch date | 31 January 2011 vs 29 July 2008 |
Pipelines | 80 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 104 gflops vs 89.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 / 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 69% higher texture fill rate: 8.8 billion / sec vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 32 vs 30
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 164 vs 94
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1505 vs 1005
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1505 vs 1005
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 8.8 billion / sec vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 32 vs 30 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 164 vs 94 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1505 vs 1005 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1505 vs 1005 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6250
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6250 | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 30 | 32 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 94 | 164 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1244 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 444 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 444 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1005 | 1505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1005 | 1505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 347 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 347 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.612 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.838 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6250 | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Cedar | G96C |
Launch date | 31 January 2011 | 29 July 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1670 | 1667 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $85.99 | |
Price now | $85.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.13 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 104 gflops | 89.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | 8.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 314 million |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVISingle Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 6.875" (17.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 / 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | 25.6 (GDDR3) and 16.0 (DDR2) |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
CUDA | ||
SLI |