AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• 3.3x more pipelines: 160 vs 48
• Around 10% better floating-point performance: 142.08 gflops vs 129.02 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 117 vs 74

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

• Around 51% higher core clock speed: 672 MHz vs 444 MHz
• Around 66% higher texture fill rate: 5.9 billion / sec vs 3.55 GTexel / s
• 5.4x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 286 vs 237
• 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1333 vs 587
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 536 vs 415
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 536 vs 415
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1731 vs 646
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1731 vs 646
• Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2380 vs 1468
• Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2380 vs 1468

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	237 286
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	117 74
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	587 1333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	415 536
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	415 536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	646 1731
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	646 1731
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1468 2380
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1468 2380

Compare specifications (specs)