AMD Radeon HD 6630M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6630M and NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6630M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
- 15x more pipelines: 480 vs 32
- 4.8x better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 99.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 73% lower typical power consumption: 26 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 685 vs 209
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 390 vs 120
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2368 vs 1901
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2368 vs 1901
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 January 2011 vs 29 July 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops vs 99.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 26 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 685 vs 209 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 390 vs 120 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2368 vs 1901 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2368 vs 1901 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 500 MHz
Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6630M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6630M | NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 685 | 209 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 390 | 120 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 984 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.847 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.549 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.527 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.818 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 424 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1055 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2368 | 1901 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 424 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1055 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2368 | 1901 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6630M | NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Whistler | G96 |
Launch date | 4 January 2011 | 29 July 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1374 | 1377 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 625 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 99.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s | 10 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 26 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 314 million |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Gigaflops | 148 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |