NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs AMD Radeon HD 6630M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K600 and AMD Radeon HD 6630M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 75% higher core clock speed: 876 MHz vs 500 MHz
• Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 14.02 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 732 vs 685
• Around 85% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1817 vs 984
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.367 vs 2.847
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1227 vs 424
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1745 vs 1055
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1227 vs 424
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1745 vs 1055

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6630M

• 2.5x more pipelines: 480 vs 192
• Around 43% better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 336.4 gflops
• Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 26 Watt vs 41 Watt
• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 390 vs 277
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 142.549 vs 118.389
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.527 vs 7.921
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.818 vs 9.393
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2368 vs 2261
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2368 vs 2261

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6630M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	732 685
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	277 390
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1817 984
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.367 2.847
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	118.389 142.549
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.921 9.527
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.393 42.818
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1227 424
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1745 1055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2261 2368
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1227 424
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1745 1055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2261 2368

Compare specifications (specs)