NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M vs AMD Radeon HD 6670

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M and AMD Radeon HD 6670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
• Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 950 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 58% higher texture fill rate: 30.4 billion / sec vs 19.2 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 66 Watt
• Around 90% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1454 vs 725
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 268 vs 246
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4041 vs 1905
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.837 vs 4.861
• Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 405.086 vs 235.463
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.098 vs 0.463
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.798 vs 15.918

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6670

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
• Around 5% better floating-point performance: 768.0 gflops vs 729.6 gflops
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 38.551 vs 33.754
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1564 vs 1094
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3260 vs 2253
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 3176
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1564 vs 1094
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3260 vs 2253
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 3176

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6670

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1454 725
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	268 246
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4041 1905
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.837 4.861
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	405.086 235.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.098 0.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.798 15.918
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.754 38.551
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1094 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2253 3260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3176 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1094 1564
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2253 3260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3176 3348

Compare specifications (specs)